Member Interest

  • Downloads and Forms

    Access downloadable documents as well as public and private NJSPBA forms. Continue…

  • Legislative News

    Keeping members informed of what is going on in the political world around them. Continue…

  • Legal Protection (LPP)

    A self funded member benefit that provides legal protection to active members of the NJSPBA in good standing. Continue…

  • Pension Planning

    A resource center to keep our members up to date on pension events, webinars, links, dates and information. Continue…

NJ State PBA Promotional Video


NJ State PBA Stands with Toms River Officers Amid Proposed Police Cuts

Toms River, NJ – The New Jersey State Policemen's Benevolent Association (NJSPBA) is working with the local Toms River PBA in opposition to the proposed ordinance by Toms River's new mayor, which seeks to cut up to four positions within the Toms River Police Department. This move has sparked concern among citizens and law enforcement officers regarding the potential impact on public safety and community services.

The NJSPBA, representing the interests and welfare of 32k+ police officers across the state, views the mayor's initiative as a direct threat to the safety and security of the Toms River community. In response, the NJSPBA is mobilizing its members, particularly those residing and registered to vote in Toms River, to support a petition against the proposed cuts.

NJSPBA President Pat Colligan, emphasized the importance of fighting senseless cuts to law enforcement which jeopardize officer and public safety, "The proposed ordinance not only undermines the operational effectiveness of our police department but also disregards the critical role our officers play in maintaining public safety. We urge all of our members in Toms River to stand in solidarity with their local colleagues and take immediate action by signing the petition."

The local community is assisting with a petition signing event at the Fairways at Bay Lea Clubhouse, and members can also sign the petition at the Law Office of Starkey, Kelly, Kenneally, Cunningham, Turnbach & Yannone. With a limited timeframe to gather signatures, the involvement of NJSPBA members is critical.

“We stand united in our commitment to ensuring the safety and well-being of the Toms River community and the police officers that serve it. We collectively call upon the residents and officials of Toms River to consider the long-term implications of the proposed police cuts and to support the petition aimed at bringing this matter to a vote,” added President Colligan.

For more information on how to support this initiative, please get in touch with the NJSPBA.

Pat Colligan, President, NJ State Policemen's Benevolent Association, (732) 636 - 8860

Legislature Approves PBA Priority Bill

On the last day of the legislative session the Senate and Assembly today approved PBA initiated legislation to remove the threat of prosecution for civil rights violations from officers who encounter minors with cannabis and alcohol.

The bill, A5610, restores the requirement that in order for an officer to be prosecuted for a deprivation of civil rights violation that there must be a finding that the officer acted to target a person who is in a protected class. Current law states that there does not need to be a finding of intent for a civil rights prosecution to occur if an officer encounters a suspected minor with alcohol or cannabis and detains the person for longer than needed to identify them, among other restrictions on officer actions with minors. 

The State PBA has been lobbying for the last few years to fix this egregious problem that has tied officers hands across the State. The lack of enforcement power due to the threat of officer prosecution has resulted in minors throughout New Jersey openly violating the underage consumption law while engaging in dangerous and sometimes violent activities. The passage of the bill has been a major priority for the NJ State PBA all session.

We would like to thank Assembly Majority Leader Greenwald and Senator Beach for their support and leadership in expediting the passage of this bill. They have been true allies in our effort to protect our members and ensure that kids are not harmed by the unlawful use of alcohol and cannabis. We are grateful the Governor agreed with our concerns and will sign the bill into law.

Governor signs 20 and Out extension

Governor Murphy today signed into law legislation extending the 20 and Out benefit for 3 more years. As previously reported the bill was conditionally vetoed by the Governor to give the pension board more time to study the financial impact of the benefit. However, the Governors veto language confirms that at the PFRS Board of Trustees has the power to make the benefit permanent in the future.

Members considering retirement should consult with PFRS staff and MBOS for the date for reinstatement of the benefit option online.

The bill was a major priority for the State PBA. Special thanks to Senator Gopal and Assemblyman DeAngerlo for their sponsorship and forceful advocacy to get the bill done before the summer recess.

NJ Supreme Court Denies NJSPBA's Request to Stay the Order of Appellate Division Upholding Gov Murphy's Vaccine Mandate

Today the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a 5-2 decision denying the NJ State PBA’s request to stay the order of the Appellate Division that upheld Governor Murphy’s vaccination mandate that applies to all State and County Correctional Police Officers. Despite two justices voting in favor of granting our request for a stay, we recognize that the Court has spoken.

The State PBA along with our 11,000 members that are affected by this mandate are disappointed that we were unsuccessful in this challenge. We are currently reviewing this decision with legal counsel to ensure that our members have a firm understanding of the decision and can undertake any individual appellate rights that they may have available to them.

State PBA Statement on Court Vaccine Mandate Decision

The New Jersey Superior Court this morning dismissed the State PBA lawsuit challenging Governor Murphy’s mandate that correctional police officers receive the Covid vaccine or face termination.

We are obviously extremely disappointed with the Court’s decision to uphold the vaccine mandate for correctional police officers.  This is not only a loss for these officers to make their own medical decisions, but it is going to have damaging public safety consequences should layoffs result from it.  Testing and masking were not an unreasonable approach to limit the spread of a virus that seems to be retreating.  In fact, in New Jersey and all around the world Covid restrictions are being lifted.  It makes no sense for New Jersey to double down on one set of employees while removing restrictions for countless others.

Firing correctional police officers for not getting the vaccine is a disaster for public safety.  Staffing in corrections is already a challenge and terminations for vaccine violations is going to lead to massive gaps in safety at our jails.  This is most certainly going to lead to more attacks on the remaining officers, who will be overworked with forced overtime.  We therefore fail to understand the value of risking public safety in exchange for a vaccine that simply is not a 100% defense against a pandemic that experts say is moving toward its conclusion.

We are grateful to Frank Crivelli, Esq. for his leadership in taking on this case and we know he is examining the decision to determine what future action is possible to address it.

1 2 3 4 5  ... 

NJ Cops Magazine

January 2024 Back Issues

President's Message

Patrick Colligan, NJSPBA President Patrick Colligan, President

If they can do it to us…

This year has certainly been one for the ages. A global pandemic, hurricanes, wildfires, the most divisive presidential election in our history, the murder of George Floyd, an asteroid that might hit be-fore election day and – because we haven’t had quite enough yet – murder hornets. I can hardly wait for November and December!

Needless to say, a few of these issues have had a profound effect on us in New Jersey. Twelve New Jersey officers lost their lives to COVID-19. Nine of them were PBA members. Some 120 officers throughout the country succumbed to the horrible disease, and tens of thousands of our brother and sister officers were profoundly affected. Many will never return to work.

As bad as we thought COVID was, May 25 was a day that changed policing forever. Some changes certainly will be for the better. Some will be downright dangerous, not only for the women and men who choose to do this job, but also for the citizens we’ve sworn to protect and serve.

So let’s fast forward to the federal Justice in Policing Act. In the rush to “do some-thing,” Congress drafted a really bad bill. The group that enjoys absolute immunity wants to take away our qualified immunity. I hope the “qualified” sufficiently describes our immunity. Yes, you are correct. We have to qualify for the immunity from lawsuits filed for damages resulting our mistakes. If you chose to act in a way that shocks the conscience or is so outside the norms of normal police work, you’re on your own. (And frankly, you should be). We make mistakes, no doubt about it. We aren’t Walmart greeters. We are in a dangerous and often ugly business. But many forget about that.

Some members of our New Jersey congressional delegation chose to sign onto that bill. One of them was even a co-sponsor. We’ve enjoyed some very close relationships and friendships with our delegation over the years. I hope I don’t have to tell you we were on the phone immediately after that bill came up. Marc, Rob and I were on some very long calls telling representatives exactly what that would do to our members and the very future of recruiting qualified candidates. A severe recruiting problem already exists.

There was no ambiguity in our conversations whatsoever. Removing qualified immunity was an absolute line in the sand. Of course, they were free to support the bill, but not without consequences.

I guess more than one of these elected officials thought we were bluffing. As they know by now, we weren’t. We have either walked away from our support or backed another congressional candidate. Yes, not without repercussions, but I live by a pretty simple rule in my life: Win, lose or draw, the day I can’t look myself in the mirror, I’ll walk away from this position.

Their unanimous answer of “it’s not passing anyway” was a shallow, feeble excuse. Depending on this election, that bill will probably be back and the “it’s not passing anyway” excuse won’t be such a shallow answer anymore.

So the delegation says, “If they do it to us, they can do it to anybody.” Not so quick folks. Maybe you weren’t listening to us on those calls. It was a line in the sand and unlike some of you, I mean what I say. The difference is, I can still proudly look at myself in a mirror today.